ÇaFleureBon Profiles In American Perfumery: Jacqueline Steele of Goest Perfumes + Absolute Specificity Draw

Jacqueline Steele of Goest Perfumes

Profile: Although I live in Los Angeles now, I’m from Michigan. I grew up halfway between the liberal-arts-hippie town of Ann Arbor and the rural farm and automotive industrial areas of Superior Township.  Even though I was fascinated by, and particular about, scent, I had no concept that there was in fact a “Fragrance Industry” out there, it just never occurred to me, and so I never aspired to be a part of it. The pieces didn’t fall into place until college when I started collecting niche perfumes. I eventually won an academic grant to travel to Paris and Grasse to study the history of the implementation of synthetic materials in fragrance, but came back to America after that.

                    

                                                                    

Jacqueline at her Perfume Organ   

From the outside it might seem like learning perfume materials is a matter of learning design principles; which molecules make nice accords, which accords make nice perfumes. From a first person perspective at least for me it was totally different. It felt more like the process of finally knowing the names of things (molecules) I already concretely remembered from out in the world. The first time I smelled Galaxolide? “So that's what's in the Jovan musk in the aerosol can I smelled at CVS a few years ago”. Cashmeran? “So that's that wet-concrete smell at the Donna Karan counter”. It like finally getting the translation key to a foreign book I already carried around. Now that was too magically exciting; no way I could stop. I also had visions of a set of fragrances and if I was going to start a fragrance house, it was totally essential that I was the perfumer and knew how to compose. It boggles my mind that people who run fragrance houses and are billed as the primary creative also hire outside perfumers to do the primary composition. If you don’t know what’s possible specifically on a molecule basis, you can’t achieve in that space; the perfumer’s nose makes essential decisions in the same way that the painter’s hand makes essential decisions.

To me, this frequent industry disconnect between marketing creative and perfuming creative is part of the reason why so many fragrances have unhelpful marketing, why it’s so hard to find a fragrance one likes. I definitely have residual annoyance about this from when I was a fragrance shopper “on the outside” before I was a perfumer. I got so frustrated when springing some of my small student income on fragrance and feeling as if the marketing or concept (like the fragrance name, the notes list, the description) had nothing to do with the scent itself when you finally smelled it. Usually the problem was the description was super evocative, specific, exciting – and then the perfume was a mismatch, often generically “perfume-y”, not specific at all. The very first thing I did when learning fragrance was to joyously chase absolute specificity: a rose in 75 degree weather outside under the sun versus a rose in 75 degree weather in a vase indoors – that kind of thing.  

On American Perfumery: I suppose to me, being an American perfumer means to feel free to practice fragrance away from traditional influences. I really idealize idiosyncrasy. While I was in France learning about fragrance initially I noticed something: the only ice cream I ever saw was gelato-style, always good quality, always good traditional flavors, but…that was all I ever saw. In America we have every kind of ice cream shop with every global style, and the most American of all: self-serve ice cream and frozen yogurt shops where you can serve yourself, mix the ice creams together, add your own toppings exactly as you want them for a flat price. Nobody tells you this or that doesn't go together. Nobody tells you can't fill your cup with chocolate syrup and put one spoon of ice cream on top. It doesn’t sound radical but it is.

Likewise the European fragrance industry has its own tradition of total excellence, and its own style apex, but it's specific, with specific codes, and not something I try to achieve or copy. Working totally away from other perfumers and companies was very influential in my sense of proportions and in my olfactory signatures. And being in America inspires me generally, especially in regard to the diversity of the landscape. In fact my first perfume, Realism, inspired by the place where I grew up, on a property with many acres of woods and riverfront and streams and ponds and grass and dramatic seasonal transformations; it isn't just an American perfume, it honors concretely the aromatic characteristics of a specific place in America – it had its own GPS coordinates, literally a celebration of American soil.

Lou Reed by David Mcgough 1977

Favorite American Artist: Lou Reed is my favorite American artist, a late musician. Since he’s a New Yorker through and through, and I literally wouldn’t live in NYC if you paid me, we couldn’t be more different in terms of our “ideal American life”; but he paints wonderfully evocative portraits of American culture on the whole. One of the reasons he's so inspiring: Lou Reed’s music influences everybody even if they don’t listen to him, know him, or like him as an artist. He owns the state of rock music so hard it’s ridiculous. Almost 50 years after his first releases so many musicians are still basically remaking his albums over and over in a sort of unsaid mesmeric phenomenon. He sort of blueprinted the universal primitive symbols of modern rock music in the same way that Picasso blueprinted the universal primitive symbols of all art in the past century. My favorite recordings of his work are “I’m Set Free” and a live version of “Ecstasy” – simple songs, but they have the whole world inside.

Jacqueline Steele, Founder and perfumer of Goest Perfumes

Goest Perfumes Dauphine, Goest Perfumes Lartigue, Goest Perfumes Grand Tour, Goest Perfumes Realism, Goest Perfumes Silent Films, Goest Perfumes Jackal

Thanks to Jacqueline we are offering six mini flacons (5mls each/$204 value), one of each of the Goest Perfumes signature EDTs to a reader anywhere in the world. Tell us what you found fascinating about Jacqueline’s path to perfumery, which fragrance might appeal to you the most and where you live. Draw closes February 24, 2019

Please like CaFleurebon Profiles in American Perfumery and your entry will count twice. Please leave that in your comment.

Jacqueline Steele of Goest Perfumes is the 141st American perfumer in this series. All photos belong to Goest Perfumes with the exception of Lou Reed.

Follow us on Instagram @cafleurebon and @goestperfumes

Available at @madameaucoinperfume

We announce the winners only on our site and on our Facebook page, so like Çafleurebon and use our  blog feed…or  your dream prize will be just spilled perfume.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


29 comments

  • Elizabeth T. says:

    I really enjoyed reading Jacqueline’s perspective on perfumery and, in a way, life. I really like her thoughts on American perfumery and her comparison to gelato/ice cream. And a perfume having GPS coordinates It’s so true. I currently live in Michigan, so her story hit especially close to home. I think the two perfumes that I’d like the most would be Lartigue and Realism. Thank you for this generous draw! I wish Jacqueline the best!

  • VerbenaLuvvr says:

    I loved the use of American ice cream, the profusion of styles we have here and no judgement in the way you choose to top it, as a metaphor for American perfumery versus how perfume making is approached elsewhere in the world. And I understand her feeling that the marketing of niche perfumery seems often so disjointed from the actual product, the frustration we so often feel when being caught up in exciting, mesmerizing marketing and then so disappointed in the blind buy. Of the Goest collection, Lartigue (citrus! sun! peach! succulent!) appeals to me most. I live in the US and thank you to Jacqueline Steele for this very generous giveaway!

  • I am so excited to smell this rose experiment. Rose is one of my favorite ingredients, and I’ve been obsessing trying to find a rose that perfectly matches a 62 degree morning rose, in a rose garden, damp with dew, in July in Vienna.
    Closest I’ve ever gotten is Mona di Orio’s Rose Etoile Hollande
    It sounds like Goest is my kind of perfume house.
    I’m based in the US. <3

  • I enjoy learning about the perfumers journey. The synthetic accords discovered by Ms Steele intrigued me. I’m always searching for another great rose fragrance. Liked CaFleurebon Profiles in American Perfumery. USA

  • I liked the way Jacqueline Steele sounds so down to earth and open to learning the science behind perfumery. And anyone who likes both Lartigue and Lou Reed has to be special. I liked the Profiles in American Perfumery Facebook page and would want Silent Films most of all. USA.

  • BostonScentGuy says:

    I loved how she talked about her misconceptions about what the art of learning perfumery was–how she regarded it initially as a “design” principle, vs. the more molecular level she discussed that it actually was. I also enjoyed hearing how she hopes to capture specificity in scent (i.e. the rose example). I also appreciate her desire to capture the diversity of the American landscape. The outdoorsiness of Realism interested me, though looking at her website, a lot of her scents sound great. I’m intrigued by Silent Films and Jackal as well–they seem dark and smoky and intriguing! Thanks for the draw. I’m in the US.

  • I couldn’t predict which one of these five might appeal to me but the name Silent Films is interesting. I agree with the “marketing concept” comment. You really don’t know until you spray and smell, US

  • What a great piece Jacqueline Steele wrote about her history and process. I liked hearing about the freedom she feels she has in America since we aren’t bound by nearly sacred tradition in perfumery. Of her creations Lartigue is most interesting to me. I’d like to think the inspiration is his photographs of women jumping and moving with joy. I live in the US.

    Thank you both to CaFleureBon and Ms. Steele for the generous chance to win a set of mini flacons.

  • I love her fierce intelligence and wit. That soft serve ice cream analogy is perfect. Please count me in for the giveaway. Based in Canada.

  • Monica Beaton says:

    Great story! I love Jacqueline’s comment on the disconnect between House and Perfumer and how it becomes hard to market a fragrance when this occurs – I agree! Great photos, and I look forward to more in the Profiles in American Perfumery series – even though they are hard to get here! I live in Australia.

  • I found Jacqueline’s comparison of her idea of American perfumery to American ice cream shops to be so intriguing and very apt. Been a fan of her work for a while now, too. She has some very interesting posts on her tumblr so it was great to see this article. I live in Singapore 🙂

  • I like Jacqueline’s view of creativity and marketing. I have often wondered about creative directors who don’t create as well. Lartigue sounds marvelous. Not your typical sport scent. Yay! Thanks for a most interesting article and a most generous draw. I’m in the USA

  • I love what Jacqueline says about unhelpful marketing and was intrigued by her path into perfumery. Would love Dauphine for the almond note. I am in the USA. Thank you for this wonderful opportunity.

  • I checked the Goest website and the description of Realism sounds what I am looking for: green, herbs, a bit of animalics, soil.
    I agree with Jacqueline that advertising can be so misleading–the concepts have nothing to do with what we end up experiencing as scent. It’s all smoke and mirrors. That’s why we need the creativity of independent perfumers.
    I love that Jacqueline loves Lou Reed but world never want to live in NYC.
    I liked the Profiles Page.
    I live in the USA.

  • I think that Jacqueline is a bit of a perfume rebel! I like it! I think Dauphine sounds terrific! Thanks for the review. In the USA

  • I love this part of the interview – I suppose to me, being an American perfumer means to feel free to practice fragrance away from traditional influences.

    I like that he doesn’t follow a particular “mold” of making perfumes. He’s open to any type of combination of notes and styles.
    I live in the USA.

  • Nice review. I think Lartigue would be my piece of cake. Thank you for this amazing giveaway, i am in the EU. I liked the profile page.

  • I can relate to Jacqueline’s experience of learning perfume materials, felt the same when I first tried cashmeran, only with Encre Noire.

    Of all the Goest perfumes Silent Films speaks to me the most: I love a good lavender scent, the mint note is a nice bonus.

    Thank you for the generous draw. Russia
    PS “Liked” CaFleurebon Profiles in American Perfumery

  • Thank you for the chance to try this unique and interesting fragrances. I liked Cafleurebon and Silent films sounds like I would like that one. , USA I love Lou Reed too!

  • I’m intrigued by her grant and academic interest in the implementation of synthetics in perfumery. Traveling to and studying in Paris/Grasse must’ve been fascinating and somewhat of a time warp:
    Investigating the elusiveness of scent, time and memory— straddling space and time; old world and new world, then and now; real and imaginary; of the natural world, synthetics as a result of the natural world; rural life and city; the woods and concrete jungle; structure and structured freedom.
    “Grand Tour” is first in line with its promise of citrus, herbs and leather; jubilant and sexy.
    “Realism” is certainly my speed—-I always was a unisex type of girl.
    “Dauphine’s” description made me, at first, cringe. But there’s a catch of a sophic and serious wink uttering that it’s beauty must be true.
    I live in the Midwest, USA.
    Thank you.

  • I know exactly what she means when she says a rose at 75 degrees outside not being the same as when it is indoors! I too find it difficult to agree on how perfumes are labelled – it’s not always easy to find that one “perfect” rose scent when you haven’t smelled it yourself (alas!). Since I am on a quest to find a new favourite rose, I would love to try Dauphine.
    I live in Sweden, and I already follow CaFleureBon on FB 🙂

  • Dorian Fischer says:

    What an interesting journey! All fragrances sound great but Lartigue appeals the most to me. Thanks for this amazing giveaway! From Austria

  • Interesting journey, and very interesting perfumes. For me Goest Perfumes Dauphine sounds the best. Thank you for the chance. I live in Europe.

  • I can fully relate with Jacqueline’s opinion about the lack of coherence between some of the perfumes and their names and stories. Most don’t live up to their description.
    The ice cream analogy is a perfect example. Her free spirit, curiosity and courage to create freely is what pushes the boundaries of creativity. Having no traditional restrictions can be a blessing in disguise.
    I think Jackal would be a fragrance I’d love: dark gourmand, a bit earthy. Her perfume descriptions are incredibly creative, evocative and even playful.
    The smokers perfume is a fantastic idea, creative and quirky.
    I’ve been following the CaFleurebonProfiles: American Perfumery page for some time.
    Thank you for this wonderful series !
    I live in Romania

  • Very intriguing story, and I love the concept behind her fragrances! I would be happy to try any of them! I like and follow Cafleurebon and always look forward to any articles that pop up! I’m in oregon USA!

  • I liked hearing about the freedom she felt in the u.s. and how she could create what she wanted not bound by traditional rules in perfumery .

    Grand Tour appealed to me most…
    Canada here