ÇaFleureBon Notes from The Lab: The Truth about Vegan and Sustainable Perfumes + An Ethical Giveaway

 

Vegan and Sustainable Perfumes

 What does Vegan Perfumes really mean? image by Kershen Teo

More and more people want clean beauty products with more natural ingredients and few if any synthetic ingredients, even when it comes to the fragrance component (which is generally only a small percentage of the mix in a beauty product such as a shampoo or skin cream). People who want this in beauty products also want to try all-natural perfumes too (at least, if they are aware of the extent to which most perfumes on the market contain little to no natural ingredients). In response to this growing demand some perfume brands are labelling their products as vegan and sustainable; but if you dig a little deeper you realise they generally satisfy both criteria only superficially and for purely marketing purposes. So when you shop for a natural product and read the buzz words ‘vegan’ and ‘sustainable’ do you think hurray, that ticks my clean beauty box? Sadly, the reality may be rather different. This article explores the facts behind vegan and sustainable perfume, explains what is potentially misleading and how these products may be simply business as usual and no different from the next brand which doesn’t make these claims.

Clean Beauty is booming, how is the fragrance industry responding to that?  via common use

Not all vegan perfumes are natural

The criteria for the Vegan Society to regard a perfume as vegan are simply that no products of animal origin are used in its manufacture. Veganism excludes animal or animal-based ingredients but it doesn’t positively mandate plant-based or natural ingredients. Faux leather, for example, the substitute material used by vegans for items like shoes and purses, is essentially plastic. Man-made. Synthetic. Just because we are used to seeing food products labelled vegan, signifying all vegetable (and presumably all natural) it’s easy to assume ‘vegan perfume’ must be plant based. but that is quite likely often not the case. The vast majority of perfumes today are very largely synthetic; they use aromachemicals which are chemically pure but often manufactured as by-products of petroleum. In other words, these vegan materials are no more natural than faux leather. Plant-based materials in perfumery are actually used as little as possible in the majority of commercial perfumes because they are often costly, limited in supply and may vary in quality from batch to batch and harvest to harvest. All this adds cost, sometimes unpredictably, to the manufacturing process and that kind of uncertainty is anathema to the finance guys (and investors) at the big perfume makers.

Is calling synthetic perfume vegan a kind of ‘green washing’? I would say so.

At best it exploits a loophole in green labelling. True natural perfumes ought not only to be petroleum-free but also plant-based and non-gmo. Your skin is an organ that can absorb chemicals it comes in contact with so to make products that are safe and clean we must ensure a minimum of potentially harmful materials in our bottle.

Jasmine common use photo

But there’s another more compelling reason I choose natural botanicals any day; its because I firmly believe they are infinitely more beautiful though harder to compose with. Try comparing natural jasmine absolute to a synthetic. With the synthetic you get a head-space sensation whilst the natural essence reaches into your groin area (jasmine has long been regarded as aphrodisiac). Similarly, try commercial oud substitute and you will get a one-dimensional burned plastic scent but a natural oud would give you layers of pleasure from woody, honeyed and spicy to cheesy and animalic; it will transport you into a totally different dimension. This is why perfumers love natural ingredients so much. We all want to make art with these incredible naturals with their inherent vitality and complexity. Lovers of naturals cannot be happy with a synthetic substitute; it’s the equivalent for us of only ever hearing music on a cheap radio instead of going to a live concert.

ambergris wikimedia

Animal-free perfume is not hard to find – but may be entirely synthetic

Few if any perfumes sold widely today still include animal ingredients. Ambergris is rare and expensive. Civet is too cruel at industrial scale. Even if there is a sustainable angle on castoreum (because in Canada they have to cull beavers to reduce the impact on trees, castoreum is only a by-product and the idea of using it doesn’t really sit well with me. The African stone or hyraceum, supposedly is only a stone with a deposit formed of dried animal urine. It only occurs in the wild and technically speaking is close to the vegan requirements since animals are not harmed or exploited in its production. Vegans don’t to my knowledge object to the use of animal dung as fertiliser for plants, although presumably this depends on whether the productive animals are exploited in other ways.

The fragrance industry almost without exception has moved away from animal ingredients not only because of their cost but also because the industry has become very good at imitating anything worthwhile in the olfactory spectrum, as well as creating powerful and unexpected novelties not found in nature such as Iso E Super. You could argue their approach is ethically sounder but it robs the world of a beauty that has been cultivated for hundreds and thousands of years, and of a vast network of specialist growers and distillers all of whom have a right to pursue their remarkable craft and to perpetuate their profound knowledge of horticulture and materials. For all the brilliance and originality of the finest contemporary synthetic perfumes there must still be a place for continuing exploration and creativity within the all-natural space.

As for the animalic group of ingredients, they are amazing modifiers in a perfume blend, not only fixing well but lending a sensual dimension and keeping things light yet stable, avoiding heavy base note ingredients which easily kill all the charm and simplicity of a blend. Without them natural perfumery is impoverished, to a degree. Yet without constraints there is no art; part of the joy of composition lies in overcoming perennial challenges by unexpected means after long experiment and reflection. As a natural perfumer, my choice of going animal free is partly faith driven. I’m a Buddhist with a small b, (because I’m not a strict vegetarian, I believe in eating a balanced diet for health reasons). I’m only vegetarian on certain days of the month according to the Chinese Buddhist calendar.

I subscribe to the idea of living with respect to all animal life and not adding more harm and killing of animals beyond what we need for food sustenance. I know that’s a somewhat mumbo jumbo excuse, not a clear-cut absolute belief. So that’s the dilemma for a natural perfumer; do I go vegan and add no animal ingredients when they play such a critical role? I believe there are many ways to substitute, but that’s a subject to cover in another Notes from The Lab essay.

The Beauty of Natural Ingredients by Kershen Teo©

Not all vegan perfumes are sustainable

So a vegan, sustainable perfume could simply be made with 100% petroleum derived synthetic aromachemicals, which is the case for nearly all mass market perfumes. If it uses only synthetic ingredients, it can call itself sustainable because the ingredients don’t involve taking up land use needed for precious food crops or conversely set aside for biodiversity rewilding. This misuse of terms allows any company to jump onto the green-washing band wagon. True sustainability is using no petroleum products at all, if we are to minimise our use of fossil fuel.

Conclusion

If as a perfumer you are guided by the beauty of natural ingredients then you choose that approach not to meet vegan precepts but because you believe those ingredients make intrinsically more satisfying perfumes than petroleum-derived alternatives. Any health or environmental gain from this artistic choice is only a by-product. If on the contrary your perfumes are loaded with synthetics then you may also be deemed to make vegan perfumes but only because nothing in your work is plant based.

Disclaimer: Opinions and perspective on all-natural vs. synthetics is the author’s

Kershen Teo, Contributor and  Natural Perfumer for Prosody London

Prosody London perfumes are vegan

Thanks to Keshen Teo of Prosody London, we have a draw for a discovery set of four vegan sustainable perfumes in the USA only for one registered. To be eligible please leave a comment about what you learned or found interesting about Kershen Teo’s article on the truth about vegan and sustainable perfumes and if that matters to you. Draw closes 10/20/2022

Please like The Series on Facebook here and your comment will count twice.

Follow us on Instagram @cafleurebonoffical @prosodylondon @indigoperfumery

Prosody London is available in the USA at Indigo Perfumery

Please read  Professional Perfumer Sherri Sebastian for Provision Scents and Sebastian Signs Sherri Sebastian’s Notes From the Lab essay on Clean Beauty

Please read Professional Perfumer Darryl Do and owner of Delbia Do’s  Notes From The Lab article Is your Perfume all-natural

This is our Privacy and Draw Rules Policy

We announce the winners only on our site and on our Facebook page, so like Çafleurebon and use our blog feed … or  your dream prize will be just spilled perfume

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


14 comments

  • Thank you for your straightforward language! It can be so hard to discern what some of these buzzwords actually mean when they’re slapped on labels or marketing materials. I appreciate the explanation of natural materials, their beauty, and the fact that they’re not always sustainable. I am not a vegan, but do believe we need to be good stewards of the resources we’ve been given. I would love to try Prosody’s discovery set! I’m in the USA.

  • This is so so Eloquent!!! ❤️❤️❤️ Standing Ovation! I’m so excited to read more!!!

  • PS – I already own & Love Prosody’s discovery set, but I would be SO HAPPY to gift one to my high school students in our Fragrance Club! USA

  • I really appreciated the pros and cons of synthetics vs authentic. Some synthetics are almost souless, maybe easier to work with for large scale but flat for layering and surprise. But saving out ecosystems is crucial so finding ways to create with easily renewable naturals seems the best way to go… it’s complicated in many ways as Keshen Teo described.
    I truly appreciate the perfumers trying their best to create their goal in the most ethical way.
    Opalbear California

  • What a great article. This is the problem. Some people only see “not animal based” but don’t understand that this definition can also have its daemons. Nothing is as cut and dry as people usually assume. In maryland.

  • kelvinz6820 says:

    I love the comparison of the trade-off between obtaining natural ingredients at the cost of animal’s welfare, such as ambergris. It sparks concerns for the livelihood of our environment when synthetic smells can create the same results without creating harm towards the environment. I live in New York, USA.

  • Thank you, Kershen and Cafleurebon, for setting the record straight.

    Often it is a challenge to actually find the accurate information we need to be informed customers.

  • I only wear natural perfumes for health reasons and hadn’t thought much beyond that, but this article opened my eyes to the bigger debate behind the naturals vs synthetics issue. The intentionally obfuscating use of words like “sustainable” in some company’s marketing copy drives me nuts though! I’m glad to see that Prosody London doesn’t follow that trend. Best wishes from the US.

  • Informative and thought-provoking article. The idea that synthetic products can cause problems and pain elsewhere (climate change through fossil fuel use) while claiming to be natural and sustainable is something one should think about. Not all synthetics are bad, and not all natural ingredients are healthy. The trick is to maintain balance and prevent abuse of animals, destruction of environment, and ill-effects to humans from the use of these products. Thanks for the article and the draw. From USA.

  • wallygator88 says:

    Thanks for the great writeup Kershen. I’ve been meaning to try your brand.

    I appreciate the clear writeup, where you go through all the media buzzwords and educate us on what the essence of a sustainable perfume is.

    Cheers from WI, USA

  • Thank you for breaking down this complex topic and exploring some of the questions we should ask ourselves when considering the merits of a vegan label on perfume. Green washing is a very real phenomenon and can be a distraction from more meaningful efforts, either on our part or on the part of the companies we support. Also, I really enjoyed the section where you highlighted the difference between synthetic and natural materials in fragrances; that line about jasmine absolute is a knockout. Personally, I’m intrigued by natural perfumes for their artistry, and don’t feel the need to seek out vegan perfumes, but I’ll keep this all in mind going forward. Thanks for the thoughtful essay, Kershen.

    I’m in the USA and I liked the series over on Facebook.

  • foreverscents says:

    I am a vegan, so vegan perfumes are important to me. I know, however, that vegan does not mean natural. I have accepted that many of the perfumes I wear might be synthetic. I am OK with that, but I hope they don’t include petroleum by-products. It is a very complicated issue and greenwashing often occurs.
    I am definitely seeking out perfumers like Prosody. I know I will make some “wrong” choices as a consumer, but I will do my best to support brands that are truly sustainable, natural, and vegan.
    I live in the USA.

  • Regis Monkton says:

    I’ve been interested in trying Prosody London’s collected works for a while now, so I hope to win the discovery set. I look forward to reading more articles from Kershen Teo, and I found this article to be helpful: it answered some questions I’ve been having concerning perfumery. I appreciate when Kershen says that he prefers natural botanical ingredients over synthetic ingredients, even though the natural ingredients can be harder to work with. The use of natural and/or sustainable ingredients is interesting and important to me. I live in the U.S.A.