Vintage Caron Infini (Ernest Daltroff 1912) reformulated by Gerard Lefort in 1972 “Elegant Aldehyde”     

 Vintage Caron Infini

Ida’s bottle of Caron Infini

Reviewing vintage fragrances always seems to involve a certain measure of falling down the rabbit hole. As one becomes engrossed, up pops a plethora of contradictory information. Honestly, I don’t do this on purpose; perhaps you have found yourself in the same position when you seek to know as much as you can about a particular perfume – which has either been reformulated or/and been discontinued. You might wonder how I deal with this conundrum.

 

Vintage Caron Infini

Caron Infini ad via The Scented Hound

When faced with conflicting dates, lists of notes, spellings, and other contrary data – I take a hard look into who is doing the writing; their background; my personal experience with the author (Do I actually know them personally? How long have I known them? Are their sources sound?). Often these variances aren’t intentional, but it does make you question which version is closest to reality. In the end, I veer towards sources I have known at length, and who I consider reliable and diligent researchers: they are thoroughly invested in their careers, and harbor no desire to compromise them.

Perfumer Ernest Daltroff

 Ernest Daltroff courtesy Fragrances of The World   

This brings us to Caron Infini, a fragrance which I have adored since 1972, when I first encountered it in a small but highly-regarded pharmacy in Harvard Square. While the original was composed by master perfumer Ernest Daltroff in 1912, most of us are familiar with the reformulation of Gerard Lefort – the 1972 iteration. I have found Infini to be dated both 1970 and 1972; although most writers name Gerard Lefort as the nose, others have referred to him as Gerard Lefortis: thus, my consternation. Yes, the year of release was 1972 – and the nose is Gerard Lefort, although there are those who cling to the belief that Ernest Daltroff was responsible for the reformulation. In truth – I have not been able to smell the 1912 original, or locate a reliable source for it in hopes of sampling the fragrance. There also exists a relatively new revamp of Infini: in 2018, perfumer William Fraysse composed an entirely different, vanillic-fruity-floral bearing the same name which in no wise resembles either of the Infinis which came before. Confused?

As far as Infini’s notes are concerned, the waters are distinctly muddy. I have read several reviews which claim that galbanum is present (galbanum is a very unique, potent green material – and I believe that you can’t mistake it for anything else), but nowhere is it listed. The indolic narcissus, hyacinth, and even lilac are referred to as well – and my best guess is that these elements were particularly present in its oldest incarnation. I bring this up to illustrate the challenges one encounters in the process of understanding how the greats were composed. Whenever I’m able, I attempt to de-mystify these perfumes for both myself and you, our readers.

Caron Paris Infini vintage

 1972 ad of Caron Infini via Ebay

Now that we are both bewildered, let’s smell the 1972 Infini, shall we? It has been said that this Caron was fifteen years in the making! Even the bespoke flacon designed by Serge Mansau is unique: a wonderfully jagged, asymmetrical flacon which was inspired by the race for space (remember, it’s the 1970s) and the mathematical sign for infinity. Infini is first and foremost an aldehydic floral, with an eruption of scintillating aldehydes, diffusive and slightly metallic in their charm. True to classical standards, it is a shape-shifter. The first dabs of the parfum reveal a glorious verdancy accented with spice, fruit, and underscored with florals which manage to skew both warm and cool – penetrating and creamy. Bergamot and neroli somehow converge as warm, woody/peppery coriander provides its spicy accent. A gentle peach (aldehyde C-14?) sidles up to rosa centifolia, much as it does in Guerlain’s Nahema. At this juncture, Infini smells velvety, and there are moments when I feel as if I am picking up tones of jasmine and lilac enveloped in carnation and iris. Some of this perfume’s greenness surely correlates to lily of the valley, hyacinth, and vetiver. If there is narcissus, tuberose, or patchouli, they don’t register as such to my nose – and I confess that ylang-ylang whispers most delicately, considering that she is an indolic, potent player at baseline. Infini’s base is an exceptionally lovely one, replete with an abundance of sandalwood, plush musk, and tonka. Civet appears as a mellow insinuation – and the chief constituent of ambergris, ambrein, contributes a discreet animalic presence which was likely more prevalent in the 1912 original composition; it’s a joy nonetheless.

1972’s Infini, despite its age, has worn well with the passage of time. It retains its individuality while keeping its classical structure – yet it’s far from stuffy, and it never quite smells the same each time you don it: this is because it develops over time, unveiling different facets all the while. It’s fascinating and easily worn by by all genders – and particularly warming in the cooler seasons. She may be elegant, but Infini is only marginally aloof. She has earned her perfumed pedigree.

Notes: aldehydes, bergamot, coriander, neroli, peach, rosa centifolia, jasmine, iris, lily of the valley, carnation, ylang-ylang, musk, sandalwood, tonka bean, vetiver, civet, ambrein

Notes cited in other sources: narcissus, night-blooming hyacinth, lilac, tuberose, patchouli, cedar

Caron Infini is part of my vintage collection (all of which I purchased), which I have amassed for over 50 years. My nose is my own…

~ Ida Meister, Deputy and Natural Perfumery Editor

Follow us on Instagram @cafleurebonofficial @idameister

This is our Privacy Policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


7 comments

  • I really appreciate how you walked us through the “rabbit hole” side of vintage hunting instead of pretending the history is neat and tidy. The way you contrasted the 1912 Daltroff original, the 1972 Lefort reformulation, and the 2018 reboot really highlights how complicated perfume genealogy actually is.

    What really hooked me was your description of the 1972 Infini on skin: that sparkling, slightly metallic aldehydic opening, the peach paired with rose centifolia, and then that plush sandalwood-musk-tonka base touched with civet and ambrein. It sounds both classical and alive, the kind of fragrance that truly shifts every time you wear it. The detail about the Mansau bottle inspired by the space race and the infinity symbol was the perfect finishing touch, it made the whole era click into place in my head.

    Now I’m really curious to smell this version of Infini and experience those evolving facets you describe so lovingly.

  • This review engages readers with an honest and immersive journey into vintage fragrances. Your commitment to untangling mixed information, paired with personal insight and thorough expertise, vividly animates the story of Caron Infini. The evocative portrayal of the scent’s changing layers, along with a careful assessment of sources, reveals both enthusiasm and skill, making your writing not only enlightening but also captivating and motivating.

  • AromaAdventurer says:

    Such a captivating read. The way Infini’s history is layered with conflicting dates, reformulations, and shifting note lists really highlights how elusive vintage perfumery can be. The 1972 version sounds incredibly nuanced that transition from sparkling aldehydes into a velvety floral-woody core is exactly the kind of evolution that makes these old compositions so addictive.
    It makes me wonder: is there any reliable way to distinguish very early batches from later ones, especially when note lists and bottle designs vary so much? The mystery is half the charm.

  • I appreciate the method note: when sources clash, weigh the writer and their track record—good reminder for vintage. Your Infini readout feels right for an aldehydic floral that isn’t stuck in amber: metallic sparkle; coriander warmth; that peach-rose velvet; and a base that’s sensuous without shouting (sandalwood, tonka, a civet whisper, ambrein). Also enjoyed the nod to the 2018 Fraysse reboot as a different species entirely. If you’ve compared batches, which decade gives the clearest green facet for you—lily of the valley/hyacinth—or is it more about concentration?

  • Dear AromaAdventurer and Jona –

    You may be disappointed, but I’m not someone who follows the rabbit hole when it comes to batches.
    I find that so frustrating – but I am probably in the minority.

    Regarding verdancy – anything from the 1970s-80s possesses a lovely green facet.

  • Kassie Tocko says:

    i love that ida owns a vintage perfume collection & can write reviews like this- i love reading about how these fragrances were made & reformulated. it is really neat to see the ad from the 70’s & sometimes, trends & fragrances that change throughout the years. i think, sometimes, it will always be a mystery how earlier on formulations were executed & that makes those fragrances all the better. :).